Flutter Entertainment and the land that time forgot
Alun Bowden assesses the operator's UK outlook and explains why Sky Bet and Paddy Power should not be lumped into the same generic recreational category
Flutter’s first half results passed in a blur with eyes focused on the big prize of the US, the PokerStars-led hit on EBITDA and the grand scale of the business overall. But there was one, somewhat important segment, that didn’t really get much attention. Flutter’s European online business was mostly skipped over by analysts and this was a little surprising as it represents 34% of Q2 revenue and 39% of H1 2020 group EBITDA. This would imply that it’s a business everyone is well aware of the risks and growth potential of, but it’s arguable if anyone can be that sure of what lies ahead as we head into the latter part of the year. The lack of interest, or deeper interrogation is understandable, however. While the US is the promised land and Australia looks to be a near-term pot of gold as retail to online migration gets a huge kick up the arse due to lockdown, it’s harder to get excited about Europe with single-digit revenue growth in the major markets, downward adjustments due to regulatory tightening and an upside of bolt-on growth opportunities in a market more complex and more challenging than anywhere else in the world. And looking more closely at the Flutter business, the UK segment, while still retaining a big slice of group revenue, has a hugely challenging profile heading into 2021 with far more questions than answers at the current time. The business now comprises the combined UK-facing brands and within those there was a clear disparity between the recently acquired Sky Betting & Gaming (SBG) business and the legacy Paddy Power Betfair (PPB) business, with SBG revenue up 32% and PPB revenue down 8% in H1. The most striking thing was the sports betting margin with Sky Bet an eye watering 14.5% in Q2, up from 9.8%. The explanation given was as follows: “Sky Bet’s expected margin increased by approximately 100 basis points due to customers betting on less mainstream (higher margin) sports. This increase in margin was likely a temporary phenomenon, given the postponement of traditional sports.” But PPB’s margin, which underwent nearly exactly the same conditions with a large majority of revenue coming from UK and Ireland (more on that shortly) had nowhere near the same benefit at 10.4%, up from 10.0%. A tale of two brands Promotions were notably up at both Paddy Power (PP) and Betfair in the period, with PP throwing out free bets like confetti, but mostly it speaks to the truly recreational player base that SBG has built and the additional margin benefits it generates during outlier periods. It is likely a period of player-friendly results would see a more dramatic contraction in margin at SBG than Paddy Power. It also shows how different the two brands still are despite many happily lumping them into the same generic recreational category. Gaming growth at SBG also notably outstripped PPB in the period and again this is due to a number of factors, but mostly relates to a stronger product and brand proposition that speaks more directly to a recreational market. Growth in SBG gaming actives was +59% y/y in H1. All told just a very strong performance by SBG in the period that makes PPB look a little unfairly weak in comparison.